🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly return the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable discussions in other member states